Three problems I have fixed more than once.
Composite scenarios drawn from seven years of implementations — the workflows are exactly what the software does.
Three floors. Three failures worth describing.
Each page describes the operation, what breaks in it, and the mechanism WMSi puts in the way of the break.
When a paper lot log is the only thing standing between you and a recall.
Paper receiving and hand-keyed lot numbers replaced with scan-verified chain of custody from dock to shipment, inside Acumatica.
What changes: lot numbers scanned from the supplier label, never typed · holds placed by rule at receipt, not by memory · Purchase Receipts post to Acumatica at session close
Receiving Quality hold Lot tracking Read the scenario Auto parts · Large · 2 facilitiesA wrong part doesn't just cost a return. It costs a customer a day on the lift.
A disconnected WMS replaced with scan-verified picking, scan-to-pack carton verification, and label printing that fires at the right moment.
What changes: a wrong scan is rejected at the bin · nothing seals with a discrepancy · carton and carrier labels print automatically, no manual step
Order fulfillment Pack & ship Label printing Read the scenario Light manufacturing · 6 assembly linesSix assembly lines running. Nobody knew which ones were going to finish on time.
Whiteboards and clipboards replaced with scanner-native component pick, multi-station kit receiving, and Assembly Orders that post themselves.
What changes: components committed in Acumatica before the assembler starts · FEFO lot consumption at receive · Assembly Order created and released at Kit Transfer, with no supervisor touching the ERP
Kitting Manager portal Inventory Read the scenarioRecognize any of these problems?
Twenty minutes with a WMSi specialist. Real scanner workflow, real Acumatica integration. No slides.